The fact that the document infrastructure is stored separately can be a benefit in the fix. The safe solution is to clear it and redo it rather than trying to fix what looks like specific displayed problems. So there's no way to know the extent of the corruption (you don't know what you don't know). Still others may be artifacts of something different. Others may be things that aren't, or can't be, displayed. Some corrupted values may be things that will show up as oddities. The user interface displays what it can within the limits of what it was programmed to do. You may not be seeing all of the problems. The user interface may not behave logically relative to what is displayed when it is dealing with corruption. If the user interface can't make sense of the corrupted values, you can't directly fix them. So you can only change things the user interface allows you to. You're dealing with a created representation of some stored values, rather than directly manipulating the document content. Even more telling is if it's a symbol that is not a standard keyboard character. Even more telling is if that is something you can't directly manipulate or delete. That symbol in the number format entry box isn't something you keyed in. In this example, you see things like a 0 point font size (which can't be selected from the list). So there is no way for you to manually enter non-compliant values. The user interface forces you to select from preset values or enter values that comply with validation rules. You can't change the settings, or changing the settings doesn't stick. You may see multiple nonsensical problems, particularly in a related collection of settings. There are several characteristics that point to corruption, rather than incorrect user settings that can be fixed by just entering the right value in a menu. However, the error symptoms can be diagnostic. I'll call that the document infrastructure.īecause the settings can be stored in compact form, a small amount of corruption can affect many different rules and many different parts of your document. The settings that drive these rules are stored separately from the document content. The software produces that display from setting values that are stored in an efficient way with the document. However, that isn't what is stored as part of the document. The application gives you a nice graphical user interface for dealing with the settings, like the menus and setting selection tools shown in the question. Rather, the user choices are stored as centralized settings, and these are applied to the whole document programmatically based on rules. This is not accomplished by embedding control characters at each relevant location in the document content, itself. In applications like Word, there are lots of global settings that deal with things like layout and appearance. How can I fix this font without recreating the whole list style? Spacing are all 9999999, but setting them to a valid value (12, 0, 100, 1 respectively) doesn't do anything at all (no error message, but also no improvement). As it's a multilevel list, I can't easily select part of it, format as needed, then change the style to match formatting. I can close the window only by pressing Cancel. However, even after fixing font size (and also re-selecting all values just to be sure), I can't approve changes by pressing OK, neither go to advanced tab as I'm getting this error message: Opening "font" properties from "define new multilevel list" window I can see that it has font size 0. In "define new multilevel list" window it's sample is already strange, it just shows as a small line at the left-top corner of the text box (see text box left from "font"), while it's sample in the list looks fine: level 4 list item", but "1.1." is just masked) It's level 4 is corrupted and looks strange (all other levels are fine): I've a multi level list defined in Word 2013.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |